withimpunity: (Default)
withimpunity ([personal profile] withimpunity) wrote2009-11-23 05:33 pm

(no subject)

Someone please tell me why it is OK for a man to stimulate getting head but it is not ok to Miley Cyrus to shake her booty a little…if I had children I would much rather have them just watch Miley as opposed to grotesque soft-core porn.

Dear Idjit,

Wow, way to distinguish. Miley Cyrus is underage, you daft twat. It's wrong because she is actually on the Disney channel, so she is automatically marketed to young girls and no, I don't want my six year old simulating pole dancing while singing Party in the USA. What's different about Adam's performance? HE'S NOT A CHILD'S ROLE MODEL. If he had a show on Disney channel and wore a purity ring or something, hell yes I might have a problem with him shoving a guy's face in his crotch rofl. But he's not, so your point is not valid.
Thank you for your time.

Photobucket

[identity profile] jameserin.livejournal.com 2009-11-23 11:43 pm (UTC)(link)
WORD.

STUPID PEOPLE ARE STUPID.

[identity profile] laced-more.livejournal.com 2009-11-24 02:03 am (UTC)(link)
Not to mention, it wasn't ok, hence the west coast edit.
ext_30154: (Default)

[identity profile] oh-mcgee.livejournal.com 2009-11-24 02:06 am (UTC)(link)
Exactly!! Who said it was ok, NO ONE.

[identity profile] laced-more.livejournal.com 2009-11-24 04:31 am (UTC)(link)
I've had to adopt a fairly strict "LA-LA-LA I can't hear you internet!" policy lately. I would make myself 18 varieties of nuts trying to explain how "I have seen this thing" does not equal "everyone approves except me". Especially considering they've also seen Miley shaking her thang, obviously.

[identity profile] force-oblique.livejournal.com 2009-11-25 12:48 pm (UTC)(link)
You are so right!

[identity profile] junalele.livejournal.com 2009-11-29 05:57 pm (UTC)(link)
I swear. And people wonder why our society is slightly screwed when it comes to our perception of sexuality. So grotesque soft-porn is better than child porn? Oh. Lord.